The controversy surrounding the CAN 2025 title has reached new heights following remarks by renowned football analyst Alexandre Ruiz. The journalist, known for his outspoken views, recently reaffirmed his stance, asserting that the Lions of Teranga should be recognized as the legitimate champions based on the match result. His comments have reignited debates about the balance between on-field results and administrative rulings in African football.

At the heart of the dispute is a disciplinary decision by the CAF, which stripped Sénégal of its victory in the final against Morocco and declared the Atlas Lions the champions instead. The Senegalese Football Federation (FSF) promptly contested this decision, filing an appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (TAS), where the case remains pending. Until a final ruling is issued, the title remains under dispute, with both sides claiming justice.

Ruiz, who has been vocal about his perspective, emphasized the importance of the final whistle, stating, “When the referee blows the whistle to end the match, the team leading at that moment is the winner. In my view, Sénégal is the champion of Africa.” His remarks have resonated strongly among supporters who argue that the game’s outcome should take precedence over administrative rulings.

However, the CAF has stood by its initial decision, citing disciplinary breaches as the basis for its ruling. The federation maintains that its regulations were correctly applied, and the title was justly awarded to Morocco. On the other hand, the FSF remains confident that the TAS will overturn the decision, restoring Sénégal’s rightful place as champions.

The debate extends beyond the two nations involved, touching on broader questions about fairness and transparency in African football governance. While some argue that rules must be strictly enforced regardless of public sentiment, others believe that on-field results should carry more weight in determining champions.