Controversy as RTS 1 skips Ousmane Sonko again
The decision by RTS 1 not to broadcast the session on constitutional revision has sparked strong reactions on social media. As netizens denounce a controversial editorial strategy, the debate over media coverage of institutions intensifies in Sénégal.
Media coverage of the constitutional revision continues to fuel debate in Sénégal. On Monday, June 29, 2026, the public broadcaster RTS 1 once again faced criticism after deciding not to air the plenary session dedicated to examining bill No. 17/2026 on constitutional revision.
This lack of broadcast immediately fueled reactions on social media, where many users denounced what they see as a selective, even political editorial choice. On X (formerly Twitter), comments multiplied within minutes of the start of parliamentary proceedings.
Some users expressed confusion over the decision. Others view it as a strategy to sideline certain political figures from public debate, particularly regarding the visibility given to contributions related to Ousmane Sonko in institutional media coverage.
“Plenary session – Examination of bill No. 17/2026 on constitutional revision,” simply relayed the account Maps Cissé, with no corresponding television broadcast on the public channel. This observation quickly ignited reactions.
On social networks, comments range from resignation to open criticism. Some netizens say “it’s no longer a surprise,” while others denounce a trivialization of media coverage of such institutional events. Scattered messages mention a decision “without surprise,” “disappointment,” or “persistent incomprehension” regarding the role of public television.
